The Missouri Secession Election in St. Charles County
by Bob Brail
by Bob Brail
One
hundred fifty years ago, in the late winter of 1861, the United States of
America roiled with tension as states, both North and
South, faced the unpleasant reality of disunion. South Carolina had left the Union in late December, its
state representatives voting 169-0 for secession. In early January, Mississippi followed (84-15) and Florida seceded soon after
(62-7). Later in January, Alabama voted to leave the Union (61-39). A few days later George also seceded
(209-89). On January 26, Louisiana became the sixth state
to leave the Union (113-17) in a little
more than five weeks. Less than one week
later, Texas became the seventh
(166-7).
As
the new Confederate government formed in Montgomery, Alabama, in early February,
politicians from both North and South waited to see if Missouri, a slave state, would
vote for secession. In January, 1861, Missouri’s General Assembly had
called for a state convention to discuss secession, “as the debate over
secession raged in Missouri.” Delegates for this convention would be chosen
by a quickly arranged statewide election on February 21. Each state senate district would chose three
delegates.
There
were several candidates in the senate district which included Warren, Montgomery, and St. Charles Counties. The two candidates from St. Charles County who opposed one another
were W. W. Edwards and Robert Frayser.
Edwards, the Unconditional Unionist (anti-secession) candidate, was a
lawyer from St. Charles who had been born in Virginia. Frayser, the Conditional Unionist (pro-secession)
candidate, owned twenty-eight slaves and farmed in Dardenne. The St. Charles Demokrat reported the following
election results:
Robert Frayser W. W. Edwards
St. Charles Market House
|
42
|
171
|
St Charles Courthouse
|
241
|
205
|
Flint Hill
|
49
|
5
|
Wentzville
|
132
|
3
|
Wellsburg
|
92
|
1
|
St. Peters
|
20
|
101
|
Naylor's Store
[Dardenne]
|
56
|
20
|
Cottleville
|
74
|
134
|
Augusta
|
28
|
137
|
Knippenbergs [Femme
Osage]
|
6
|
99
|
Hays Mill [near Defiance]
|
50
|
1
|
Callaway New Melle
|
64
|
131
|
Portage
|
68
|
23
|
TOTAL St.
Charles Co.
|
922
|
1031
|
Warren Co.
|
574
|
236
|
Montgomery Co.
|
457
|
621
|
TOTAL District
|
1949
|
1888
|
Although a slim majority of St. Charles County voters chose W. W.
Edwards, Robert Frayser was elected by all voters in the senate district. As the St. Charles County secession election
returns indicate, the southern portion of the county tended to be against
secession, yet approximately 300 voters had supported the pro-secession
candidate. The western portion of the
county overwhelmingly supported secession.
Soon after the election, the St. Charles Demokrat’s Augusta correspondent
characterized that precinct’s results as “contribut[ing] to holding high the
Union banner in Missouri.” The writer went on to sarcastically describe
the only two voters in Augusta of German descent who had voted for Frayser, the
secession candidate: “The one was a man who . . . felt it necessary to arrange
his own head like a grain bin, carefully removing from it everything that other
people store there. The other man is a
neighbor of the first, whom he considers an ideal of human happiness and . . .
culture which he also would like to achieve. . . . Lots of luck!”
These
strongly held views had nearly erupted into deadly violence on the day
delegates were elected. The St.
Charles Demokrat reported: "On the last election day, the friends of
both Tickets: for or against the
Union, had been working harder than ever for the cause […] and the men, fired
up with drink, got caught up in a kind of "fighting" state. A certain Mason, about whose character no one
can sing hymns of praise […] got into a dispute, took off his coat and vest,
threw his hat away and was slugging it out with several others. He must have
come out on the short end, because when he stood up again he was covered from
top to bottom with filth, his pants ripped off in the fight and he made his
escape […] dressed only in his shirt. A German rode after him with a club, but he
was pursued by an American shooting at the German with a revolver. Mr. James
Simms, who is otherwise well liked, was also involved in the fight and received
a number of dangerous wounds which, if nothing worse develops, at least will
require a doctor’s care for a good while.
“On
Friday the news arrived here that as a result of the aforementioned incident
about 50-60 Americans, armed with rifles and the like, set out from Wentzville
to New Melle to take revenge on the people in New Melle. During the night a
special message arrived for the sheriff from New Melle asking for the help and
support of the law. Having arrived in New Melle, he rode forward to meet the
men coming from Wentzville, but he had a hard time dissuading them from their
unauthorized, illegal plan. Only when he threatened to read them the riot act
did they give in. The Germans had not been idle at the reports of the advances
of the Wentzvillers. They had holed up in several houses in such a way that if
it had really come to an attack, the Americans would have been caught in a
murderous crossfire. Thanks to the efforts of the sheriff, it did not come to
that. . . . The sheriff arrested several of the people involved in the incident,
namely Conrad Weinrich, John Schnorr, and Heinrich Rübling. However, as many claimed, the latter is
supposed to have had nothing to do with the affair. These three were put under
bond to appear at the next criminal court. Karl Koch and Julius Heldenberg, who
are supposed to have actually done the fighting, were able to escape. Also, the
American who shot at the German has been charged." On March 7, 1861, the Demokrat
stated: “New Melle is almost empty, all businesses lying still, many moved away
with all their belongings.” By the
middle of April, the newspaper reported that twelve men had been charged with
rioting, including ten Germans.
The
first session of the Secession Convention met in Jefferson City on February 28 and on
March 1 chose Missouri ex-governor Sterling
Price to be its chair. Although eighty-two
of the ninety-nine delegates had been born in slave states, mostly Virginia and Kentucky, very few of them
wanted secession. Three days later the
convention reconvened in St. Louis at the Mercantile
Library. On March 21, the delegates
voted 98-1 against secession, deciding “no adequate cause [existed] to impel Missouri to dissolve her
connections with the Federal Union.” Missouri was never a serious
threat to leave the Union after this.
Sources: “150 Years Ago, St. Louis Was Scene of
Secession Struggle,” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 6 Mar. 2011 (Tim O’Neil); Crossroads:
A History of St. Charles County, Missouri (Steve Ehlmlann); A History of
Augusta, Missouri, and Its Area, 1850’s – 1860’s (Anita M. Mallinckrodt); “Missouri
Constitutional Convention” (www.en.wikipedia.org);
The St. Charles Demokrat (microfilm); “A Summary of the States That
Seceded from the Union” by Dallas Bogan (www.tngenweb.org/
campbell/hist-bogan/secessedStates.html); Year: 1860 – Census Place:
Dardenne, St. Charles, Missouri – Roll:M653_644 – Page: 845 (779) – Image: 350
(284) – Family History Library Film: 803644.
The author
would like to thank Dr. Walter Kamphoefner for providing the election results
and the account of the New Melle incident.